Hastings Law Journal
  • Home
    • Masthead
    • Prospective Members
    • Supporters
  • Submissions
  • SCOCAblog
  • Issues
    • Volume 70, Current Volume
    • Volume 69
    • Volume 68
    • Volume 67
    • Volume 66
    • Volume 65
    • Online
    • Archives
  • Symposium
  • Alumni
    • Support HLJ
    • Newsletter
    • Events
    • Alumni Board
    • Update Your Information
Select Page

Institutionalization, Investment Adviser Regulation, and the Hedge Fund Problem

by charlebois | Apr 3, 2014 | Volume 63, Volume 63, Issue 1

Anita K. Krug Volume 63, Issue 1, 1-52 This Article contends that more effective regulation of investment advisers could be achieved by recognizing that the growth of hedge funds, private equity funds, and other private funds in recent decades is a manifestation of...

Patent-Eligible Inventions After Bilski: History and Theory

by charlebois | Apr 3, 2014 | Volume 63, Volume 63, Issue 1

Joshua D. Sarnoff Volume 63, Issue 1, 53-126 The U.S. Supreme Court has continued to require that patentable subject-matter eligibility determinations be made by reference to three historic, categorical exclusions (scientific principles, natural phenomena, and...

The Psychology of Procedural Justice in the Federal Courts

by charlebois | Apr 3, 2014 | Volume 63, Volume 63, Issue 1

Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff Volume 63, Issue 1, 127-178 This interdisciplinary Article examines our federal court system from the perspective of the psychology of procedural justice—that is, subjective perceptions about the fairness of process. The Article considers...

Crime Mapping and the Fourth Amendment: Redrawing “High-Crime Areas”

by charlebois | Apr 3, 2014 | Volume 63, Volume 63, Issue 1

Andrew Guthrie Ferguson Volume 63, Issue 1, 179-232 Crime-mapping technology has the potential to reshape Fourth Amendment protections in designated “high-crime areas.” In Illinois v. Wardlow the Supreme Court held that presence in a high-crime area is one of only two...

Is There a Constitutional Right to Select the Genes of One’s Offspring?

by charlebois | Apr 3, 2014 | Volume 63, Volume 63, Issue 1

Andrew B. Coan Volume 63, Issue 1, 233-296 The Supreme Court has long recognized a due process right to make deeply personal decisions such as whether to bear or beget a child. Might this right extend to selecting the genes of one’s offspring? Perhaps more important,...
Read more
« Older Entries

Hastings Law Journal

UC Hastings College of the Law
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102-4978
Phone: 415.581.8960
Email: hlj@hastingslawjournal.org

Help Support HLJ

If you or your firm wish to get involved with or show your support for Hastings Law Journal, you can make a donation by clicking here.

Recent Publications

  • Promise, Peril, and Procedure: The Price-Anderson Nuclear Liability Act
  • The Street View of Property
  • Explaining Choice-of-Entity Decisions by Silicon Valley Start-Ups

Spring Symposium: The Jurisprudence of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy

On Friday February 1, 2019, U.C. Hastings and its flagship law journal will sponsor an all-day symposium on its campus in San Francisco on the Jurisprudence of Justice Kennedy.

For more information, please view our updated press release, here.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress