Hastings Law Journal
  • Home
    • Masthead
    • Past HLJ Mastheads
    • Prospective Members
  • Submissions
  • Issues
    • Volume 72 (Current Volume)
      • Volume 72, Issue 1
    • Volume 71
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
    • Volume 70
    • Volume 69
    • Volume 68
    • Volume 67
    • Archives
  • Symposium
  • Alumni
    • Support HLJ
    • Newsletter
    • Events
    • Alumni Board
    • Update Your Information
  • SCOCAblog
Select Page

Don’t Forget Due Process: The Path Not (Yet) Taken in § 2254 Habeas Corpus Adjudications

by charlebois | Apr 10, 2014 | Volume 62, Volume 62, Issue 1

Justin F. Marceau Volume 62, Issue 1, 1-66 Countless articles and judicial opinions have been devoted to the task of deciphering the scope and application of the limitations on habeas corpus relief announced in the Anti- Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of...

Liability for Unconscious Discrimination? A Thought Experiment in the Theory of Employment Discrimination Law

by charlebois | Apr 10, 2014 | Volume 62, Volume 62, Issue 1

Patrick S. Shin Volume 62, Issue 1, 67-102 Recent scholarship in employment discrimination law has wrestled with the problem of unconscious bias and its implications for antidiscrimination law. This Article addresses what some might regard as a naïve question: Should...

War and Peace in the Jury Room: How Capital Juries Reach Unanimity

by charlebois | Apr 10, 2014 | Volume 62, Volume 62, Issue 1

Scott E. Sundby Volume 62, Issue 1, 103-154, Using data from the Capital Jury Project, this Article takes a close look inside the jury room at the process by which capital juries reach a unanimous verdict at the penalty phase. The Article first examines the...

Note – A Reasonable Alternative to the Reasonable Alternative Design Requirement in Products Liability Law: A Look at Pennsylvania

by charlebois | Apr 10, 2014 | Volume 62, Volume 62, Issue 1

Andrew Meade Volume 62, Issue 1, 155-184 The manner in which design defects should be defined has caused more controversy than any other area of products liability law. The Restatement (Third) defines a product design as defective when the foreseeable risks of harm...

Note – Invalidating Gene Patents: Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office

by charlebois | Apr 10, 2014 | Volume 62, Volume 62, Issue 1

Ashley McHugh Volume 62, Issue 1, 185-220 Biotechnology companies and research institutions have patented thousands of genes based on the idea that a gene in an isolated and purified form is a patentable invention. The biotechnology industry has since grown to a...

Hastings Law Journal

UC Hastings College of the Law
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102-4978
Phone: 415.581.8960
Email: hlj@hastingslawjournal.org

Help Support HLJ

If you or your firm wish to get involved with or show your support for Hastings Law Journal, you can make a donation by clicking here.

Recent Publications

  • The Unitary Executive Theory in Comparative Context
  • Corporate Technologies and the Tech Nirvana Fallacy
  • Facilitating Money Judgment Enforcement Between Canada and the United States

Spring Symposium: The Jurisprudence of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy

On Friday February 1, 2019, U.C. Hastings and its flagship law journal will sponsor an all-day symposium on its campus in San Francisco on the Jurisprudence of Justice Kennedy.

For more information, please view our updated press release, here.

  • Twitter
For general website inquiries, contact technology@hastingslawjournal.org. For all other inquiries, contact hlj@hastingslawjournal.org. All rights reserved.