Hastings Law Journal
  • Home
    • Masthead
    • Past HLJ Mastheads
    • Prospective Members
  • Submissions
  • Issues
    • Volume 72 (Current Volume)
      • Volume 72, Issue 1
    • Volume 71
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
    • Volume 70
    • Volume 69
    • Volume 68
    • Volume 67
    • Archives
  • Symposium
  • Alumni
    • Support HLJ
    • Newsletter
    • Events
    • Alumni Board
    • Update Your Information
  • SCOCAblog
Select Page

Dying for Equal Protection

by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | Apr 8, 2020 | Volume 71, Issue 3

Teri Dobbins Baxter Volume 71, Issue 3, 535-588 When health policy experts noticed that health outcomes for African Americans were consistently worse than those of their White counterparts, many in the health care community assumed that the poor outcomes could be...

From a Panacea to a Panopticon: The Use and Misuse of Technology in the Regulation of Judges

by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | Apr 8, 2020 | Volume 71, Issue 3

Amnon Reichman, Yair Sagy, & Shlomi Balaban Volume 71, Issue 3, 589-636 This Article reveals the untold story of Legal-Net, Israel’s cloud-based judicial management system. While scholarly attention has thus far focused on the narrow question of the impact...

Psychological Distress, Mental Disorder, and Assessment of Decisionmaking Capacity Under U.S. Medical Aid in Dying Statutes

by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | Apr 8, 2020 | Volume 71, Issue 3

Lois A. Weithorn Volume 71, Issue 3, 637-698 This Article examines concepts of treatment decisionmaking capacity relevant to medical aid in dying as it is currently authorized in the United States. In order to be eligible for medical aid in dying in one of the ten...

Managerial Fixation and the Limitations of Shareholder Oversight

by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | Apr 8, 2020 | Volume 71, Issue 3

Emily Winston Volume 71, Issue 3, 699-748 BlackRock’s recent public letters to the CEOs of the companies in which it invests have drawn substantial attention from stock market actors and observers for their conspicuous call on corporate CEOs to focus on sustainability...

Reconceiving Legal Siblinghood

by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | Apr 8, 2020 | Volume 71, Issue 3

Ruth Zafran Volume 71, Issue 3, 749-782 How should the state treat siblings’ legal relationships in cases where the relationship is based solely on genetics, such as between siblings who were born of the same sperm donor, but did not grow up together? How should it...

Google—Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200: Why the Tech Giant Is a “Bad” Monopoly

by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | Apr 8, 2020 | Volume 71, Issue 3

Alicia Ginsberg Volume 71, Issue 3, 783-812 Congress enacted the Sherman Act in 1890 to promote competition and creativity in the marketplace. The Sherman Act prohibits agreements that restrain trade and lays out rules regarding monopoly power. This Note explores...
« Older Entries

Hastings Law Journal

UC Hastings College of the Law
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102-4978
Phone: 415.581.8960
Email: hlj@hastingslawjournal.org

Help Support HLJ

If you or your firm wish to get involved with or show your support for Hastings Law Journal, you can make a donation by clicking here.

Recent Publications

  • The Unitary Executive Theory in Comparative Context
  • Corporate Technologies and the Tech Nirvana Fallacy
  • Facilitating Money Judgment Enforcement Between Canada and the United States

Spring Symposium: The Jurisprudence of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy

On Friday February 1, 2019, U.C. Hastings and its flagship law journal will sponsor an all-day symposium on its campus in San Francisco on the Jurisprudence of Justice Kennedy.

For more information, please view our updated press release, here.

  • Twitter
For general website inquiries, contact technology@hastingslawjournal.org. For all other inquiries, contact hlj@hastingslawjournal.org. All rights reserved.