by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 18, 2023 | Volume 74, Issue 5
Candice Enders & Joshua P. Davis Volume 74, Issue 5, 1331-1352 Attention to how courts address the ethics of defense counsel’s communications with absent class members before class certification is valuable for two primary reasons. First, it provides insight into...
by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 18, 2023 | Volume 74, Issue 5
Lauren E. Godshall Volume 74, Issue 5, 1353-1372 Mass torts cases take up a massive swath of the nation’s federal court docket yet are governed by little to no substantive procedural laws. Instead, a host of regular practices for multidistrict litigation (“MDL”)...
by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 18, 2023 | Volume 74, Issue 5
Roger Michalski Volume 74, Issue 5, 1373-1402 Ethical norms in litigation are policed through overlapping regulatory regimes. One of these regimes is internal to litigation and split into different components, including Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11, 26(g), and...
by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 18, 2023 | Volume 74, Issue 5
Melissa Mortazavi Volume 74, Issue 5, 1403-1432 When courts consider a choice of class or lead counsel in multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) or class action suits, they often follow the idea of a neutral partisan model. Such a model idealizes lawyer conduct as a blank...
by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 18, 2023 | Volume 74, Issue 5
Eli Wald Volume 74, Issue 5, 1433-1458 The legal ethics of class actions is a mess, with many lingering, unresolved questions and conflicting answers. The culprit is a fundamental lack of agreement regarding the identity of the client, without which it is impossible...
