by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 30, 2024 | Volume 75, Issue 4
Laura I Appleman Volume 75, Issue 4, 913-976 Who is accountable for the imposition of punishment in our carceral system? The answer used to be much simpler, as we held local, state, and federal government actors responsible. In recent decades, however, our...
by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 30, 2024 | Volume 75, Issue 4
Itay Ravid & Jonathan Zandberg Volume 75, Issue 4, 977-1046 Access to credit—that is, the ability to receive financial leverage that could help jump-start businesses—is one of the most significant barriers preventing millions of American women from opening new...
by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 30, 2024 | Volume 75, Issue 4
Jacob S. Sherkow Volume 75, Issue 4, 1047-1096 Are DNA sequences subject to trade secrecy protection? At least three decades of scholarship has assumed so even while there is no explicit statutory authority directly on point and very few reported decisions in the...
by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 30, 2024 | Volume 75, Issue 4
Amna Qamer Volume 75, Issue 4, 1097-1138 United States courts have long struggled to define the intersection of public institutions and religious practices. Though higher education institutions aim to enrich their campuses with diverse communities, they often fail to...
by technology@hastingslawjournal.org | May 30, 2024 | Volume 75, Issue 4
Victor Qiu Volume 75, Issue 4, 1139-1164 By the time federal appellate courts began to examine the withdrawal of money from an ATM and the question of to whom that money belongs pursuant to the first paragraph of the Federal Bank Robbery Act (“FBRA”), 18 U.S.C....
